Tags: Data Collection Inspection Risk Based Inspection
Don Conger, Senior Consultant at AOC, discusses the inherent subjectivity of evaluating inspection effectiveness. Too much subjectivity can lead to inconsistent results in your inspection effectiveness evaluation. This subjectivity can be mitigated through up-front activities including training, documentation, quality control, and planning.

Although evaluating inspections to determine the confidence in or effectiveness of finding potential damage mechanisms plays a relatively significant role in determining Probability of Failure (POF) in many Risk Based Inspection (RBI) software tools, it remains one of the most subjective pieces of collected data required to support an RBI implementation.
This subjectivity is in part due to:
Tips on improving the process involve training and guidance.
Prior to the start of an RBI study, consider the importance of assigning inspection confidence, how inspection confidence can be assigned, and how it impacts your risk assessment and associated inspection plans. Consider how your inspection reporting has evolved over the years as well as what your typical inspection procedures are. Summarize this and share it with your RBI team members who will be evaluating the historical inspections. (In one extreme case, a client informed our RBI team in the Kickoff Meeting they had absolutely no confidence in their historical piping inspections and not to bother giving credit for them.)
Develop inspection strategies that, in part, provide guidance about the information that should be returned as inspections are complete. This helps insure the risk analyst has the information necessary to accurately assign inspection confidence.
Prior to the start of a turnaround, provide training to the TAR inspectors on how to properly report their inspection activities and what forms to use before they perform inspections. The inspectors should be made aware of what level of detail and what inspection techniques will be needed in their inspections and associated reports in order to achieve a Very High, High, Medium or Low inspection effectiveness. More importantly, prior to the inspection activity, what effectiveness level will be required to potentially reduce the POF of the asset(s) in question, based on risk projections, for any predicted damage mechanism.
Provide ongoing quality control of the historical inspection evaluation effort during the RBI study and of the quality and uniformity of inspection reporting during the turnaround in order to ensure consistency.
Inspection reporting has improved significantly over the years. Unlike some older reports, very rarely do you see a recent inspection report that merely says, "Performed internal inspection - OK". RBI outputs will be improved by following these tips.
AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.
When evaluation of inspection results suggest that an asset is near its end of useful life, Fitness for Service evaluations can determine if the asset us suitable for continued operation.
Asset Optimization's Inspection Group provides our partners with comprehensive inspection resources to further support our internal needs and the needs of our partners. Consisting of both API-certified inspectors and ASNT-compliant technicians, our inspection team offers a variety of visual inspection and NDE services.
How well do you know RBI? Take this short quiz to test your knowledge of the API 580 risk-based inspection (RBI) work process.
Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.
A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection
What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?
Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?
What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.
A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.
Practical guide for implementing a Mechanical Integrity and RBI program for U.S. oil and gas wellfield, gathering, and midstream facilities. Aligns lifecycle asset management, inspection, and risk control with API standards, PHMSA pipeline rules, and OSHA PSM requirements.
Don’t let your RBI program become a "paperwork exercise." Learn how to distinguish between a qualified technical partner and a software-only contractor to ensure true operational safety.
Organizations that follow the spirit of risk-based inspection rather than its minimum requirements use a definable, structured, auditable process to confirm that an alternate inspection technique provides equal or better risk reduction than a baseline method.
Safety-first organizations consistently outperform on reliability when priorities are truly enforced, not just stated.
Can Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) finally replace vessel entries? Explore the roadblocks to RBI, validated POD data for UT and RT, and a new framework for technical equivalency in modern refinery maintenance.
A look at several of the secondary benefits of Risk Based Inspection
How AOC's new AI solution cuts data collection time for Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) projects by automatically extracting and normalizing data from historical engineering documents, achieving very high accuracy and reducing costs.
Budget tight? Some Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) risks are too critical to delay. Learn the top 3 RBI risks that can't wait for a budget rebound.
This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.
A dysfunctionality found in many refineries, chemical plants, and other production facilities, is a lack of common asset management work processes.
Comments