Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Revalidation

, 10/24/2018 2 Comments

Tags: Risk Based Inspection


Our Senior Corrosion and Mechanical Integrity specialists provide useful insights into the determination of the process information to be used for Risk Based Inspection (RBI) projects. Incorrectly assigning process conditions for a particular piece of equipment can result in overlooking a variety of applicable damage mechanisms and a skewed calculation of risk. Guidance derived from experience is provided to ensure the process conditions are appropriately identified for a number scenarios that have an impact on damage mechanisms and consequence calculations.

This is the first in this eight-part series.

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) implementation and revalidation efforts require process engineers to provide process information on representative fluids, operating temperatures, operating pressures, and toxic fluids to be used in consequence models of RBI software. To streamline the work process and minimize the effort expended by the process engineer in gathering, scrubbing, and tabulating the required information for each piece of piping and equipment covered in the RBI effort, this process data is usually also used as the primary data for performing a Damage Mechanism Review.

Taking into consideration that process conditions in a unit may vary significantly due to breaches in operating conditions, cyclic service, process upsets, and frequency of shutdowns, it is sometimes difficult to determine the actual values to use for the process data. Yet the impact of the values that are selected to be used can be significant in the risk that is calculated by the RBI software (due to the impact on the consequence model), the damage mechanisms that apply, and to the inspection plans that are generated.

As an example, an insulated 304SS vessel from the 1960's had an operating temperature that varied from 320°F to 480°F and was assigned an average operating temperature of 400°F. Taking into consideration the 400°F operating temperature that was provided by the process engineer, the vessel had not previously been assigned a chloride stress cracking (Cl-SCC) environmental damage mechanism since external wetting is not expected at these high temperatures. However due to actual operating conditions of frequent shutdowns and cyclic service operation where the temperature cycled from ambient to 480°F, the vessel experienced external Cl-SCC and had to be replaced.

It is more straightforward to assign process data in some units and equipment than in others and the required level of sensitivity in providing process data may vary with the process unit being evaluated or with the particular equipment being assessed. Therefore, it is important for the process engineer and other RBI team members work closely to ensure there is a good level of understanding of how the process information provided will affect the damage mechanisms that are assigned and the risk levels that are calculated by the RBI software since the risk levels and damage mechanisms will drive the types of inspections that are to be carried out as well as the frequency and extent of inspection.

This series of short articles will provide guidelines on assigning process conditions for RBI efforts. Over the course of the next few weeks / months we will be discussing guidelines for each of the following:

  1. Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Revalidation (this introduction)
  2. Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) and How it Relates to Risk Based Inspection
  3. Process Fluids and Consequence Models
  4. High Temperature Damage Mechanisms
  5. Low Temperature Damage Mechanisms
  6. High Temperature Hydrogen Attack
  7. Environmental Cracking Damage Mechanisms
  8. Concluding Remarks

Stay tuned for the next entry in this eight-part series.


Comment on this article

Comments

11/1/2018 - John M Danna
Leon: Great synopsis and example of the subtlety of assumption and impact on risk assessment. Great job!!
1/15/2019 - Christos Christoglou
Great informative synopsis. The RBI Team needs to know and ask the correct questions, assuming that the unit personnel has no idea about RBI and what might be important.

Add your comment

Related Services

Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Implementation and Planning

AOC has delivered thousands of sustainable Risk Based Inspection (RBI) programs earning the trust of owner operators.

Damage Mechanism Review / Corrosion Study

One of the most important steps in an RBI project is the corrosion study or damage mechanism review.

End-of-Life, Remaining-Life, and Fitness-for-Service Assessments

When evaluation of inspection results suggest that an asset is near its end of useful life, Fitness for Service evaluations can determine if the asset us suitable for continued operation.

Related Tools

API 580 Work Process Quiz

How well do you know RBI? Take this short quiz to test your knowledge of the API 580 risk-based inspection (RBI) work process.

RBI Potential Savings Calculator

Create mechanical integrity (MI) program value rather than it being seen as a necessary cost to minimize.

Related Training

RBI/MI Overview

A high level overview introducing Mechanical Integrity and Risk Based Inspection

API 580 RBI Overview

What impact does Risk Based Inspection (RBI) have on my organization?

API 580 Training

Is your Risk Based Inspection (RBI) program aligned with the API 580 Recommended Practice? Are you ready for certification?

API 581 Overview

What's actually going on inside all of that fancy software? An introduction to the API 581 methodology.

API 581 Training

A deep dive into quantitative Risk Based Inspection (RBI) as outlined in API 581.

Related Knowledge

Risk Strategies for Pressure Retaining Equipment

What are equipment/inspection strategies in relation to mechanical integrity (MI) and risk based inspection (RBI)?

API 580 (4th edition) Required Elements

What are the requirements of API 580, 4th edition?

Hidden Benefits of Risk Based Inspection (RBI)

What are the hidden benefits of implementing Risk Based Inspection?

How to Incorporate the New PHMSA Underground Gas Storage Requirements

This is a practical approach to incorporating the new PHMSA gas well rules into your integrity program with the rest of your surface and subsurface assets.

Asset Value Management vs Asset Performance Management

A look at how the financial sector's concept of Asset Value Management can be applied to the petrochemical industry.

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization Example

An example to compliment our earlier proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

Proposed API 581 Inspection Plan Optimization

A proposal for a risk analysis option that allows for individual damage mechanism risk calculation in API 581

RBI Value: Both Transitioning And From The Start

A look at how RBI adds value whether you are just starting out or transitioning from a traditional methodology.

Other Benefits of Risk Based Inspection Implementation

A look at several of the secondary benefits of Risk Based Inspection

Guidelines for Providing Process Conditions for RBI: Cracking

Additional process data may be needed when environment, stress, and metallurgy are so alligned so as to indicate susceptibility to environmental cracking.